We found 605 results that contain "community engagement"

The Community Resource Directory lists resources for MSU students, staff, and faculty pertaining to financial challenges, including information on home foreclosures, debt relief, food banks, health care, and public assistance.

Strategies for Engaging in 
Dialogue Across Difference
 
Interrupting Bias: The PALS Approach
This is a methodology to use when you hear someone say something that may be problematic or hurtful to a specific group of people or yourself. The objective of this approach is to stay connected with the person and speak your truth clearly. 
 
Pause/Halt/Slow the conversation
Interrupt the flow of the conversation and let the speaker know you are interested in learning more about something they said – “Wait a second..”
 
Acknowledge/Ask
Ask for clarification, get curious, make sure you understand what the person said – “What I hear you saying is…” 
 
Listen to what the person said
Practice engaged listening in which you truly try to understand the meaning of what is being said.
 
Speak your truth/Share stories
Share your experience and/or learning. Tell stories, as they are shown to be more effective than data at reaching hearts and minds
 
How to Apologize:
Re-AACT
Reflect - listen to what others are saying is the harm done
Acknowledge responsibility for your actions
Apologize and DO NOT explain your intent
Change your behavior
Thank them for bringing this to your attention

Interested in participating in MSU Dialogues? 
 
Faculty & staff applications will open soon!
Email Jackie Heymann at heymannj@msu.edu to among the first to receive the application as soon as it opens.

Topic Area: Information Session
Presented By: Cheryl Williams-Hecksel
Abstract:
The Trauma Services and Training Network, formed in 2018, is comprised of representatives of academic and service units at MSU that are involved in providing trauma specific services and training. In the Fall of 2019, this focus expanded as a TSTN Faculty Learning Community was formed. The TSTN continues to convene members of the University community who are interested in and committed to creating a trauma informed institution. The work of TSTN has continued and takes on increasing significance as members of the University community negotiate the current pandemic as well as current issues related to racial disparities and discrimination.
The principals that a trauma informed institution embraces are Safety, Trustworthiness, Choice, Collaboration and Empowerment with ongoing attention to issues of Equity and Inclusion. A trauma informed organization promotes these principals as values that support assuring that all people are engaged in a manner that is sensitive to potential adverse and traumatic experiences. This roundtable discussion will engage participants in exploring strategies and challenges related to engagement of students through trauma informed teaching and service delivery.This roundtable provides an important opportunity for the TSTN to engage additional stakeholders in the current and future work of the faculty learning community.
Trauma Informed Teaching – Source List – May 2021
Carello, J., & Butler, L. D. (2015). Practicing what we teach: Trauma-informed educational practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(3), 262-278.
Copeland, W. E., Keeler, G., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2007). Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress in childhood. Archives of general psychiatry, 64(5), 577-584.
Davidson, S. (2017). Trauma-informed practices for postsecondary education: A guide. Retrieved October, 12, 2019.
Galatzer-Levy, I. R., Burton, C. L., & Bonanno, G. A. (2012). Coping flexibility, potentially traumatic life events, and resilience: A prospective study of college student adjustment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31(6), 542-567.
Griffin, M. J., & Read, J. P. (2012). Prospective effects of method of coercion in sexual victimization across the first college year. Journal of interpersonal violence, 27(12), 2503-2524.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Ruggiero, K. J., Acierno, R., Saunders, B. E., Resnick, H. S., & Best, C. L. (2003). Violence and risk of PTSD, major depression, substance abuse/dependence, and comorbidity: results from the National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 71(4), 692.
Knight, C. (2010). Indirect trauma in the field practicum: Secondary traumatic stress, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue among social work students and their field instructors. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 15(1), 31-52.
Michigan State University, Sexual Assault & Relationship Violence Training, Prevention, Outreach and Education Department. https://poe.msu.edu/programs/index.html ,2021.
Minahan, J. (2019). Trauma-informed teaching strategies. Educational Leadership, 77(2), 30-35.
O’Donnell, M. L., Creamer, M., & Pattison, P. (2004). Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma: understanding comorbidity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(8), 1390-1396.
Perkins, S., & Graham-Bermann, S. (2012). Violence exposure and the development of school-related functioning: Mental health, neurocognition, and learning. Aggression and violent behavior, 17(1), 89-98.
Read, J. P., Ouimette, P., White, J., Colder, C., & Farrow, S. (2011). Rates of DSM–IV–TR trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder among newly matriculated college students. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 3(2), 148.
Rodenbush, K. (2015). The effects of trauma on behavior in the classroom [Presentation materials]. Retrieved from Monterey County, Office of Education website: http://www. montereycoe. org/Assets/selpa/Files/Presentation-Materials/The% 20Effects, 20, 299-309
Rytwinski, N. K., Scur, M. D., Feeny, N. C., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2013). The co‐occurrence of major depressive disorder among individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta‐analysis. Journal of traumatic stress, 26(3), 299-309.
Smyth, J. M., Hockemeyer, J. R., Heron, K. E., Wonderlich, S. A., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Prevalence, type, disclosure, and severity of adverse life events in college students. Journal of American College Health, 57(1), 69-76.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014.
University of Buffalo School of Social Work (January 2020) Trauma-Informed Organizational Change Manual. The Institute on Trauma and Trauma-Informed Care, https://socialwork.buffalo.edu/ittic

Fostering Student to Instructor Engagement Online
In a traditional face-to-face environment, this can be pretty straight forward. You lecture. Students take notes. They ask questions. You answer them. They write papers. You grade them and give feedback. But how does this interaction happen best online?
Four Keys 
Students desire consistency and clarity. "What is due when? Where do I go in the course navigation? I'm confused, how do I gain clarity? Where are my grades?" There are ways in the online environment you can help mitigate these for a smooth learning experience. 
A Little Work That Go A Long Way

Provide your contact information in your syllabus - Clarify to the student what your response policies are and when they might expect a response. This may include your email, phone number, online office hours, etc. This helps the student feel a sense of connection and commitment from you to them. 
Create one solitary discussion thread called, "Assignment and Course Questions". In your syllabus and in your "Getting Started" module, coach the students to put all questions there. This allows you to answer one question to all and mitigates you answering similar questions many times. You can then answer one question to many. Saves you time and provides an answer to the student with the question as well as all students.
Weekly Recap/Vision. Students appreciate a quick recap and vision for each week to know where the course is heading. Creating a quick email and sending it through D2L every week helps the students feel connected to the course and to you. It also helps coach them on whether they are on track or not. You can also triple-publish this as an email, announcement and in your "Assignment and Course Questions" discussion thread. That way you know your students will see it. Consider going a step further and using your phone or computer to record a quick video recap and post it there. 
Timely and Accurate Feedback. Students want and need feedback. You know this in your face-to-face courses. The same is true online. One way to provide this efficiently is through the use of rubrics. This provides students with real time feedback and saves a lot of time on your end with extended feedback. We can assist with creating these rubrics for your course and offer ways you can get quality feedback to your students quickly.

Dig Deeper
If you would like to further explore this topic, here are some resources you could check out:

Difference Between Face-to-Face and Online Lectures 
Guides for Productive Online Conversations [PDF] 
8 Ways to Be More Inclusive in Your Zoom Teaching 

SOIREE Team:
Design Lead: Sarah Wellman
Content Leads: Kate Sonka, Stephen Thomas, and Jeremy Van Hof
Content Authors: Jason Archer, Kevin Henley, David Howe, Summer Issawi, Leslie Johnson, Rashad Muhammad, Nick Noel, Candace Robertson, Scott Schopieray, Jessica Sender, Daniel Trego, Valeta Wensloff, and Sue Halick

Engaging with representatives of the institution is a key attraction for event attendees. Part of your planning must account for the various types of engagement to offer, including securing commitments from the individuals that will be on stand-by to engage.
Consider the following:

Scheduled/Reserved: Consider providing attendees with the option to schedule time to connect with others during the event. This structure can provide additional value and foster additional engagement. In addition, make sure to thoroughly evaluate the reservation The solution should be intuitive, have a non-obtrusive user flow, and include confirmation once the reservation is complete.
Talent Management: From an administrative perspective, establish lines of communication associated with each type of participant supporting your effort (e.g., faculty, staff, students, alumni) and work to obtain commitments and scheduling.

NOTE: Engagement can be provided within a specific solution/platform or externally (e.g., Dischord). You’ll want to thoroughly evaluate how you plan to approach this part of the experience.

Topic Area: Student Success
Presented by: Perry Fittrer, Jonglim Han, Christina Bridges, Dominique Devereaux
Abstract:
This session will present how three different student success programs maintained student sense of belonging and community in a virtual setting. The Detroit MADE Scholars, Dow STEM Scholars and TRIO Student Support Services programs are all cohort based student support programs housed within the Neighborhood Student Success Collaborative unit. Each program strives to close opportunity gaps for a variety of underserved student populations. Through the pandemic each program has utilized creative and unique forms of student engagement to keep students connected to MSU and program communities. This session will explore the importance of community, sense of belonging, and identity to student success while providing examples of program specific and collaborative efforts to provide these elements virtually.
Session Resources:
Developing and Sustaining Community-NSSC Path (PDF)

As a scholar and a clinician, Dr. Buchanan shared advice on how the MSU community and those who have experienced a traumatic event can stay informed while also protecting their mental health. Dr. NiCole Buchanan is a professor of ecological-community psychology at MSU and the Clinical Director and Founder of Alliance Psychological Associates, PLLC in East Lansing, MI.
https://psychology.msu.edu/news-events/news/media-after-trauma.html

Michigan State University is a big place. Literally. The campus itself is 5,192 acres (just over 8 square miles). Over 900 registered student organizations exist, along with over 60 greek organizations, 275+ study abroad opportunities, and a student-run organic farm; and that’s just co-curriculars! MSU offers more than 200 programs of undergraduate, graduate and professional study across 17 degree-granting colleges. It takes A LOT of human capacity to support Spartans. MSU has over 13,000 employees - many of whom are educators of some kind!
In such a large organization, it can be difficult to find others with common interests, share ideas and reflections, and ultimately elevate small successful approaches to larger audiences. Here on the #iteachmsu Commons, you can join or create an informal learning community through the site’s Group function! Groups can be public where anyone with a MSU netID can op-in to joining, or private where members have to be invited to join. Already there are groups related to topics like online and remote teaching, accessible course design, and new technologies. Were you looking for a group but didn’t find one that matched your interests? Any logged in user can start their own group; the only required information is a group name, brief description, image, and which category most represents the group. In a group, the feed can be used for group-specific dialogue, where users can post and respond to one another. Additionally, once a public group is created, any member can share content (articles, posts, playlists) specifically to that group! For step-by-step instructions on building a group, visit the Creating a Group article in the Getting Started resources.
If you’re looking for a more structured Learning Community experience look no further than our colleagues at the Office of Faculty and Academic Staff Development (formerly Academic Advancement Network)! According to their website, “Learning Communities provide safe and supportive spaces for complicated conversations about curriculum and pedagogy. Michigan State University has supported these initiatives since 2004 and continues to do so through a funding program administered by the Office of Faculty and Academic Staff Development. All communities, however, share three things in common: they meet monthly across the academic year, explore important educational themes, and welcome all members of MSU’s instructional staff, regardless of rank or discipline.” To access a current list of the Learning Communities supported by the Office of Faculty and Academic Staff Development, check out this Learning Community webpage! (Some of the 2021-2022 Learning Communities have even created #iteachmsu Groups! Check out the "Reading Group for Student Engagement and Success" as one example.)