We found 84 results that contain "equity"

Title: Incorporating equitable pedagogy into your classroomPresenter: Valerie Hedges (Physiology); Casey Henley (Neuroscience & Physiology)

Description: Increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in higher education aim to cultivate learning spaces where all students have the ability to thrive and succeed. Our learning community, Equitable Pedagogy: Removing Barriers to Learning, has spent the year reviewing methods for making the classroom more inclusive. In this workshop, we want to share those practices with our participants. Many components of our course design can affect our students’ perceptions of belonging. This workshop will explore how we as instructors can choose to be more equitable in our classrooms towards the creation of more inclusive learning environments. Our focus will be on the course syllabus as a framework to discuss the many ways in which we as instructors can better address issues of equity. Topics will include language and tone of the syllabus, flexible course structure options, fair attendance and late work policies, providing opportunities for collaboration and social connectedness, instructor presence, and equitable grading policies. Participants should bring their course syllabus to the workshop to annotate as we openly discuss practical ways to increase equity and inclusion within our courses. The workshop is relevant to in-person, online, and hybrid courses.

There are a variety of considerations when it comes to course content. Now, if you’re close to the start of the semester, it is likely that you have already chosen (and submitted to the Registrar Office) your textbook and/or required materials for student purchase. Please consider the following when selecting your supplemental course content (additional materials, case studies, scenarios, etc.)... and for your primary texts next term. 
Diversifying voice - who is represented?
“Does your syllabus demonstrate to students that everyone has a place in your field of study? … Pedagogically, we might find it challenging to create a sense of belonging in a course when some students cannot imagine themselves as part of the community of scholarship and practice” (Marcella Addy et al., 2021, p. 52). Wow, that statement is really powerful, especially considering some recent scholarship. Schucan Bird and Pitman (2020) found, after an analysis of reading lists, that the reading lists did not represent the diverse local student body but came closer to representing the demographic profile of academic staff (dominated by white, male, and Eurocentric authors). Despite challenges across disciplines and settings, educators should make every effort to center students in their course design and make course materials a descriptive representation of the student body itself (Schucan Bird & Pitman, 2020). This shift can include showcasing the contributions of marginalized groups (Blackburn, 2017) with greater representation of perspectives, histories and approaches of scholars (Le Grange, 2016), along with adopting efforts to decolonialize teaching and learning (Phillips & Archer-Lean 2018). 
Looking for ways to get started? Colleagues at Tufts University Libraries (according to this Inside Higher Ed article) have noted that diversifying your course materials to include content about and by marginalized scholars (groups whose characteristics result in the systematic denial of equal rights and opportunities within a community or society including but not limited to race, socioeconomic status, gender identity, sexual orientation)  helps to “foster an environment that includes knowledge that has been systematically excluded from academia.” You might…

Considering diverse authorship of readings (ethnicity, gender, geographic location)
Inviting guest speakers who bring different perspectives
Using diverse audio and visual materials, such as films, interviews and TED talks
Incorporating readings that challenge standard approaches
Using primary research with authorship that reflects local collaborators
Offering multiple perspectives in assigned readings and letting students choose what to read or discuss at times.

Faculty members “can identify resources that highlight historically underrepresented researchers and activists in our fields,” she suggests. “We can include statements and topics in syllabi to decode our courses, structures and expectations. We can work to decolonize the power dynamics of our classrooms so what students already know and experience is also seen as a valuable contribution to the learning environment,” said Bridget Trogden (presently serving as Dean of Undergraduate Education at American University). Improving diversity and inclusion of voices in educational materials isn’t necessarily difficult, educators just need to be intentional. Fuentes et al. (2021) go beyond centering authors of mariginalized backgrounds, and recommend educators transparently acknowledge their intentional material selections. The example they provide in their article Rethinking the Course Syllabus: Considerations for Promoting Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion is, "The following text/articles for the course have been chosen in efforts to highlight the important work of historically underrepresented and marginalized scholars in the field" (Fuentes et al., 2021, p.75).
“The proof is in the data: children are more likely to have a more productive learning experience and thrive in the classroom, throughout the school and in their communities when they see themselves represented in curriculum and library materials,” said Lessa Kanani'opua Pelayo-Lozada, President of the American Library Association. If data supports diversifying reading may boost a student’s development and well-being, WHILE ALSO increasing a sense of belonging and breaking down barriers to collegiate success… what reasons do we have not to reimagine our course materials?
Accessibility of digital content
The experts at MSU IT who manage the Digital Accessibility page recommend that educators ask the following questions before adopting digital content (adapted with permission from UC-Boulder’s Digital Accessibility Program):

Ask for Publisher Information: Contact the publisher to ask them for details about the accessibility of your particular textbook and/or digital content. This should include all known accessibility issues, any workarounds that the student can use, a named point of contact, and any guidance on how to ensure any content you create within the platform is accessible.
Review your Assessments: If you use digital online quizzes, ask the publisher for a list of quiz question types that are accessible. Review your own quiz content to ensure that none of your questions rely on drag-and-drop actions, images without alt text, or other inaccessible mechanisms.
Consult with Digital Accessibility Specialists: Contact your local Accessibility Policy Liaison for support and reach out to the MSU IT Digital Experience (DigitalX) team for help evaluating your digital content at webaccess@msu.edu or call the IT Help Desk at 517-432-6200.
Notify your Students: If the digital content (including texts, assignments, tests, or online homework systems) used in your course are not fully accessible, please notify your students in your syllabus with the following statement: “This course requires the use of [name of software or service], which is currently not accessible. Michigan State University is committed to providing equal opportunity for participation in all programs, services and activities. Accommodations for persons with disabilities, with documentation from the MSU Resource Center for Persons with Disabilities, may be requested by contacting [insert Professor name or "me"] at the start of the term and/or two weeks prior to the accommodation date (test, project, etc). Requests received after this date will be honored whenever possible. For questions, contact the Resource Center for Persons with Disabilities at 517.884.7273”

For more information on Digital Accessibility check out the “Course Accessibility: Commitments, Support, and Resources” article, visit the Accessibility Evaluation Questions for Digital Content page, or contact your college/department’s Web Accessibility Policy Liaison. 
Cost as a barrier to access
Buying school materials can cost a lot, creating a barrier for students and impacting their collegiate success. Taking measures to curtail expenses on mandatory learning resources is not only a stride towards rendering college more cost-effective and attainable but also promotes equity. Embedding no-cost course materials into a syllabus provides the avenue to diminish financial burdens on students, foster more inclusive access to education, and enables the repurposing, blending, and creation of course content specifically tailored to each class. According to MSU Libraries Open Educational Resources (OER) Program, OER are “teaching, learning, and research resources that are copyright-free (public domain) or have been released under an open license that permits others to reuse, revise, remix, retain, and redistribute them. Examples of OER include open textbooks, videos, images, course modules, lectures, homework assignments, quizzes, lab and classroom activities, games, simulations, and other resources contained in digital media collections from around the world.” 
Diversifying Course Materials: A How-To Guide on Inside Higher Ed (previously linked) shared four additional considerations for instructors when considering their course materials.

Accessibility, affordability and adaptation
Relatability and reflection
Clarity and intentionality
Alternative perspectives

Read more about each of these four considerations at the link above and check out the resources below for more in depth from authors cited throughout this article. 
Resources

Marcella Addy, Dube, Mitchell & SoRelle (2021) What Inclusive Instructors Do. Stylus Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003448655
Schucan Bird, K. & Pitman, L. (2020) How diverse is your reading list? Exploring issues of representation and decolonisation in the UK. Higher Education, 79, 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00446-9. 
Le Grange, L. (2016). Decolonising the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.20853/30-2-709.
Blackburn, H. (2017). The status of women in STEM in higher education: a review of the literature 2007–2017. Science & Technology Libraries. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658.
Phillips, S. R., & Archer-Lean, C. (2018). Decolonising the reading of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander writing: reflection as transformative practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1539956.
Fuentes, M. A., Zelaya, D. G., & Madsen, J. W. (2021). Rethinking the Course Syllabus: Considerations for Promoting Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959979


Photo by Paul Hanaoka on Unsplash

The "Welcome to My Classroom" series functions like a pedagogy and practice show and tell where educators from throughout MSU's ecosystem share something from their teaching and learning practice. Valerie shared the ways she has integrated practices in her courses to enhance and center equitable opportunities for learning!

Here are some key take-aways from Dr. Hedges:


When it comes to syllabus language, be transparent about your choices and don't be afraid to cite sources for your rationale. We ask students to cite their sources, we should too. If you need help surfacing and/or naming your pedagogical practices, contact the Center for Teaching and Learning Innovation!
Fostering a sense of belonging is important to student success. Instructors can design interactions at three levels to help promote a students sense of belonging: learner-learner interations, learner-instructor interactions, and learner-content interactions. Check out the recording (below) for more on each!
Being flexible can make a big impact.  Where and when do students in your course have a sense of choice or agency in their learning? Are you sharing content in ways that allow people multiple modes of engagement? What barriers to accessing your learning experience exist? What are your current late work policies (and why do they exist - see takeaway bullet one)?
Not all the things "we've always done" are the best way of ding things. When it comes to grading, one simple way to make your practices more equitable is to remove participation and attendance based grades. If you want to consider bigger shifts, you might think about giving students multiple attempts at quizzes. Valerie incorporates feedback and learner reflection into this practice, and has ultimately moved away from a point-based grading system to what she calls "ungrading-lite"
A more student-center course with a focus on equitable practices has ultimately contributed to a more accommodating and empathetic environment for all!

Resources for Continued Growth:
To support your ongoing professional development please consider these resources:

Slide Deck: Access Valerie’s Welcome to My Classroom slide deck which outlines why equitable pedagogy is important, shares examples of how Valerie fosters a sense of belonging through a welcoming course structure, and highlights key considerations of equity in assessments and grading.
Syllabus Example: In the Q&A following Valerie's formal presentation she shared an example of one of her course syllabi to demonstrate the language she uses to set the tone for her learning environment, describe her approach to grading, and more.
Online Discussion: Do you have excamples of equitable, inclusive educator practices that you'd be willing to share broadly? Consider adding an article describing your practice, outlining an activity, or even reflecting on an experience! You can also share how Valerie's talk sparked ideas and questions about equitable pedagogy in the comments below. Both can be done by logging in to the #iteachmsu commons (you're already here!) with your MSU netID (click "log in" in the upper right corner)! 
Recording: In case you missed the session or would like to revisit it, you can view the full recording on MediaSpace (also embedded below).

The cover photo for this article was sourced from "EquityTool". 

This post provides an overview of inclusive pedagogy. This post is the first part of the Inclusive Pedagogy series and playlist.
Inclusive pedagogy is an umbrella term that encompasses many frameworks for teaching (e.g., critical pedagogy, feminist pedagogy, culturally responsive pedagogy, universal design for learning). Many of these are defined and overviewed in Emory University’s Inclusive Pedagogy Guide. Across these frameworks, all center intentional pedagogical strategies working to make education where “all learners feel welcomed, valued, and safe” (Hogan and Sathy 5), particularly working to remove systemic barriers that have harmed learners. 
It asks educators to consider, “Who might be left behind as a result of my practice? How can I invite those learners in?” (Hogan and Sathy 11). According to Cardon and Womack, inclusive pedagogy’s “approach is deeply contextual, personal, and political” (2). Within that, educators work to lifelong unlearning and learning as they raise critical consciousness to bias and systemic oppression while also supporting all learners equitably to feel agency, valued, and supported in their learning. 
When diversity, inclusion, and equity are centered in education, learners have enhanced learning, success and retention, and feelings of belonging (University of Michigan). Moreover, inclusive pedagogy increases learners’ critical thinking, collaboration, and sense of “mutuality and reciprocity” (University of Chicago).
Continue to read more about inclusive pedagogy in the next article, “Centering Intersectionality in Inclusive Pedagogy” or return to the Inclusive Pedagogy playlist.

What is the Office of Civil Rights?
At Michigan State, the Office of Civil Rights includes Prevention, Outreach, and Education Department (POE), the Office of Institutional Equity (OIE), the Office of the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator, the Resolution Office, and the Office of Support and Equity. OCR’s goal is to make campus a safe and inclusive environment for all students, staff, and faculty.
What role does OCR play in digital accessibility on campus?
OCR is responsible for creating and maintaining MSU’s digital accessibility policy, particularly in making sure it is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Act. This policy includes details of technical guidelines for making university sites accessible. The OCR can also connect you with digital accessibility liaisons, and they provide a form for reporting MSU affiliated sites that are not digitally accessible. Learn more about OCR’s role in digital accessibility on campus here.
Who should I contact about digital accessibility in OCR?
The OCR has formed a digital accessibility team that leads initiatives to connect individuals on campus with resources related to creating accessible websites and course content. The team also evaluates technologies and software for their accessibility components.
The digital accessibility team leads digital accessibility initiatives and implementation at MSU. The digital accessibility team provides resources and tutorials for accessible web development, course, and content development, and reviews and evaluations of technology products and software for the MSU community.
The Digital Accessibility Team includes: 

Digital Accessibility Coordinator - Dennis Bond - ocr.dennisbond@msu.edu
Accessibility Review Coordinator - Josie Davidson - ocr.josiedavidson@msu.edu
Accessibility Data Programer - Kristoffer Bakken - ocr.KristofferBakken@msu.edu
Digital Accessibility Specialist - Liz McDaniel - ocr.lizmcdaniel@msu.edu

This article is part of the Digital Accessibility Toolkit.

Introduction
Peer review has long been recognized as a valuable tool in education, offering students an opportunity to develop critical thinking, communication, and collaboration skills while engaging deeply with course material. However, effectively incorporating peer review into a course requires intentionality and a strategic approach.
One effective way to design and implement peer review activities is by using a transparent assignment design framework. This approach ensures that students clearly understand the purpose, tasks, and criteria for peer review, making the process more equitable and impactful.
In this article, we’ll explore a roadmap for integrating peer review into your teaching, weaving in the role of transparency to enhance the experience. From reflecting on your goals to identifying practical tools, we’ll cover five key areas to help you make peer review an enriching experience for your students.
1. Reflecting on Intentionality in Peer Review
Incorporating peer review is most impactful when done with a clear purpose. Before introducing it into your course, ask yourself:

What specific skills or outcomes do I want students to achieve through peer review?
How does peer review support my course objectives?

To make your goals explicit to students, use a transparent assignment design framework. That is, clearly communicate:

The purpose of the peer review activity (e.g., to develop critical thinking or improve a draft).
The specific tasks students will perform and t he related resources needed (e.g., providing feedback and rubric needed to evaluate a peer's work.
The criteria for which their peer review asignment will be graded.

This intentionality and transparency ensure that peer review isn’t just an add-on but an integral part of the learning process.
2. Skills Students Develop Through Peer Review
Peer review offers students a unique opportunity to develop a range of skills that are crucial both academically and professionally:

Critical Thinking: Analyzing peers’ work encourages students to evaluate ideas, apply concepts, and synthesize information.
Communication: Providing constructive feedback helps students articulate their thoughts clearly and diplomatically.
Collaboration: Peer review fosters a sense of community and helps students learn to work effectively with others.
Metacognition: By reviewing others’ work, students reflect on their own learning, recognizing strengths and areas for improvement.

Transparency can further enhance these benefits. For example, providing explicit criteria for feedback helps students focus on specific aspects of their peers’ work, reducing anxiety and promoting constructive critiques.
3. Considering a Peer Review-Focused Course Objective
A course-level learning objective focused on peer review can make its purpose and value explicit to students. For example:

"Provide constructive feedback on a peer’s work, focusing on both strengths and areas for improvement"
"Review a peer’s design proposal for adherence to engineering standards."
"Analyze a peer’s speech draft for clarity, persuasion, and audience engagement."

Transparent assignment design can support this goal by helping students understand how peer review aligns with their broader learning outcomes. This clarity ensures that students see peer review not just as a task but as a meaningful opportunity for growth.
4. Best Practices for Applying Peer Review as an Assessment Strategy
Successfully integrating peer review into your course involves thoughtful planning and execution. Here are some best practices:

Set Clear Expectations: Use the transparent assignment design framework to outline the purpose, tasks, and criteria for peer review.
Train Students: Dedicate some time in-class or offer an asynchronous pre-recorded lecture with resources on how to give constructive and respectful feedback. (e.g., see tips on providing helpful feedback)
Incorporate Reflection: Encourage students to reflect on the feedback they receive and how they can apply it.
Balance Workload: Use peer review for formative purposes (e.g., drafts) as well as summative assessments to avoid overwhelming students.
Monitor the Process: Be available to mediate or guide discussions if necessary, ensuring feedback remains constructive.

Transparency ensures that students understand the "why" and "how" of peer review, reducing confusion and increasing their investment in the process.
5. Tools and Resources for Faciliating Peer Review
Technology can make implementing peer review more efficient and scalable. Some tools to consider:

Learning Management Systems (LMS): While D2L does not offer a native Peer Review feature there are ways of setting up a D2L course so that it can handle Peer Reviews. 
Internal Tools that offer Peer Review functionality: EliReview and Perusall. 
External Dedicated Peer Review Tools: Tools such as Kritik or FeedbackFruits provide specialized features for peer assessments.

Using the transparent assignment design framework, you can integrate these tools effectively by providing clear instructions and rubrics. Additionally, many institutions provide support through teaching and learning centers, offering templates and guides to help you design peer review assignments.
Conclusion
Integrating peer review into your course can transform the learning experience, fostering critical skills and deeper engagement among students. By reflecting on your goals, aligning peer review with course objectives, following best practices, and leveraging transparency, you can create a meaningful and efficient process.
Transparent assignment design enhances every step of this process, making expectations clear and accessible to all students. This not only supports equity but also empowers students to fully engage with peer review as a valuable learning activity.
Have you used peer review in your course? Share your experiences and insights in the comments! If you’re new to peer review, consider trying a small activity in your next course and building from there. For additional support, reach out to the Center for Teaching & Learning Innovation!

Resources:

Transparent Assignment Design, Transparent Grading
Generic Peer Review Assignment Examples
46 Peer Review-Related Learning Objectives

Alicia Jenner:
Within the landscape of higher education, Alicia Jenner stands out as a beacon of innovation and empathy. As a key member of Michigan State University’s Center for Teaching and Learning Innovation [CTLI], Alicia is dedicated to making education more accessible and equitable for all learners. 
Alicia’s path to educational leadership wasn’t linear. Growing up in Marquette and graduating from Northern Michigan University, she initially aspired to become a speech pathologist. However, a conversation with a former professor at Northern Michigan University introduced her to the field of instructional design. 
“I knew I liked working with people and making connections,” Alicia reflects. This insight, combined with her extensive knowledge of educational practices, directed her towards her current career path.
After earning her master’s degree in Curriculum and Instructional Technology, Alicia’s career took her to Iowa State University. There, she played an essential role in preparing engineering faculty to teach online and to embrace online education, an experience that broadened her understanding of the ‘scale of ability’ with technology among faculty and students alike.
Now at CTLI, Alicia leads projects that are reshaping the landscape of online and continuing education. As the project lead for online.msu.edu, she’s at the forefront of building digital infrastructure that serves both for-credit and non-credit programming. .
“In everything we do at the CTLI, it’s a team effort,” Alicia emphasizes. “We all bring our own areas of expertise to advance initiatives.” Her work spans from analyzing enrollment and financial data to tackling retention and recruitment challenges, all with the goal of making online education at MSU more equitable. She has built and rebuilt online.msu.edu twice and is currently working on its third update, focusing on community engagement and developing a centralized registration system for non-credit programs to make lifelong learning more accessible.
Alicia’s commitment to equity extends beyond the university walls. Her involvement with UPCEA [the Online and Professional Education Association] allows her to collaborate with professionals across multiple regions in North America, discussing emerging trends and challenges in the field.
True to her passion for education, Alicia is currently pursuing a Doctorate of Education in Leadership for Education Equity in Higher Education from the University of Colorado Denver. Balancing her studies with her full-time work at CTLI, Alicia embodies the spirit of lifelong learning that she champions for others.
“If I have an opportunity to get out of my little bubble, I will always take it,”  Alicia says, reflecting on her constant desire to learn and grow.
As Alicia continues her journey in educational leadership, her focus remains clear: to create more accessible learning opportunities for all. Her work aligns closely with the MSU 2030 Strategic Plan, particularly in recruiting and supporting the success of a more diverse student body in Graduate and Professional programs.
Through her dedication, empathy, and innovative spirit, Alicia Jenner truly embodies what it means to be an Educator of Impact, continuously working to break down barriers and open doors in the world of higher education.

What inspired you to pursue this project?



What inspired our team to pursue this project was to create a virtual reality application that included data from common scenarios to help individuals recognize their own biases in action. The purpose of developing this immersive experience was to demonstrate examples of situations many people experience every day. Our hope is that this project will provide a way for us to better understand the lives and experiences of people different from ourselves.



Who was involved in the project or made a significant contribution?



 
In addition to Dr. Quentin Tyler and Dr. Linda Nubani, the team includes CANR Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion representatives Ayodele Daré, Phillip Seaborn and Dr. Emily Sorroche.



What are some of the successes that you have experienced on this project?



Some of the successes that we have experienced in this project is the purchase of the oculus headset and success in downloading the A Mile in My Shoes project into the system, we have been able to stay in contact with the VR company to help in updating the VR application with new features in a reasonable time and scripts for the scenarios that we have drafted have been completed and are ready to be used with our participants. Our team has officially settled on a day for the beta test of this project.



What are some of the challenges that you have experienced on this project?







Some challenges that we came across were barriers regarding copyright issues that prevented us from utilizing an unconscious bias video that is instrumental in the overall training. Additionally, the team recognized the need of additional avatars to better represent the MSU Community so we contacted the vr company to assist in creating more avatars.












Describe some of the unexpected outcomes that occurred during this project?



Some of the unexpected outcomes that occurred during this project. Initially when this project was being developed, we intended to unveil this project in 2021 but due to the pandemic, we had to place a hold on the project. However, this prompted our team to develop a method for most MSU employees and students to access the system remotely without the headset.










What are the key lessons that you learned from the project?From working on this project we have learned that it is incredibly important for people to experience different situations and have conversations with others about diversity, equity and inclusion in safe and enlightening spaces. Through the system we can provide a safe space for our participants to prepare them for when they experience a microaggression and how they can act and support those that may experience it.



How would you describe the final status of the project?
The program is continuously being updated to improve the overall VR experience. Our team is updating the features in the vr system for accessibility use and new avatar creation. We are beginning to schedules sessions for participants to volunteer to be apart of the beta test for the program that we intend to schedule in January



What are the next steps for this project or research?







In January, we will be moving into the next stage for out beta test of the system. We will be scheduling to invite staff members to go through the “A Mile in My Shoes” project. They will go through the scenarios that office as created and observe the situations and describe how they would have handled the situation. Additional future plans include making the VR application available to more people and units at MSU, as well as supporting broader usage by other universities and organizations.