We found 37 results that contain "iah-udl"

In mid-November, CIRCLE hosted a workshop on interdisciplinary course design and teaching. It was a generative conversation that gave MSU educators interested in interdisciplinary teaching the chance to connect and share resources and tactics. We showcased 2 panelists with experience designing and teaching interdisciplinary courses: Erin Dreelin (Fisheries & Wildlife and Center for Water Studies) and Garth Sabo (Director of the Center for IAH). The panel discussed effective interdisciplinary course design, strategies to address potential challenges, and the potential benefits of interdisciplinary courses for instructors and students.This workshop's goal was for both new and seasoned interdisciplinary educators to move their own practices forward, from classroom strategies to evaluation of interdisciplinary teaching effectiveness. Participants had the opportunity to reflect on their own interdisciplinary teaching philosophies and work on individualized plans for interdisciplinary teaching.You can watch Garth Sabo's panel contribution video below, in which he describes some of his experiences plannign and teaching interdisciplinary courses. You can also access CIRCLE's interdisciplinary teaching resources at this link. Our resources include:



Harden's Ladder of Integration framework for interdisciplinary course design
a handout including the benefits, challenges, and institutional resources to support interdisciplinary teaching
a personalizable planning worksheet that you can print and complete



If you have any questions about interdisciplinary course design, you can contact Ellie Louson, CIRCLE's associate director of interdisciplinary teaching & learning (lousonel@msu.edu), or our panelists Erin Dreelin (dreelin@msu.edu) and Garth Sabo (sabogart@msu.edu). Save the date for our second interdisciplinary teaching & learning workshop, which will focus on co-teaching and collaboration on interdisciplinary teaching teams. It will be held February 14th 10AM-1PM (registration link TBA).If you are interested in further programming from CIRCLE, please apply to become one of our affiliates here: https://research.msu.edu/circle/affiliate-faculty-program  (we accept applications on a rolling basis).

The following is a list of the educators receiving the #iteachmsu Educator Award from the College of Social Science. For more information on these awards, check out the article entitled "#iteachmsu Educator Awards".
Amanda Kreuze: Amanda is appointed as the instructor of the online version of ISS310: People & the Environment for the Spring Semester 2020. As the course administrator and coordinator, I could not do my job without a highly motivated and knowledgeable person like Amanda in that role. She truly cares for her students and does her best to make sure that they are not only successful, but also that their online experience in People & the Environment is positive. The situation that students (and instructors) now find themselves in is unfathomable in many regards, but Amanda continues to do all that she can to provide a safe and positive online environment for students to learn. Thank you Amanda for all that you do for onGEO and your students!
 
Ida Djenontin: In addition to maintaining high performance on her own work, Ida has been a great support to both me and students in her role as TA for two of my classes this Spring! She has done a yeoman job with grading, but more importantly, has taken many other steps to get to know the undergrad students and to help with management. These have been crucial in helping us all successfully navigate the transition to 'remote' instruction. I deeply appreciate her work ethic and positive demeanor.
 
Rajiv Paudel: We would like to recognize Rajiv Paudel, graduate student in the Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, for his unwavering understanding and compassion through an unprecedented semester. Rajiv is teaching GEO325 (Geographic Information Systems) for the Department this spring and found himself responsible for transitioning 42 students through a swift transition to remote learning. Throughout this transition, Rajiv has been concerned for his students and their situations, in and out of the virtual classroom. Rajiv has been willing to work individually with students to remedy technical challenges with the fully online labs and repeatedly put his students first. The onGEO group is grateful for all that you do, Rajiv!
 
Aaron Luedtke: Aaron is one of those exceptional graduate students who devotes a tremendous amount of energy on being one of the best teachers in our department. Aaron received the Harry Brown Graduate Fellowship for Academic Excellence from our department in 2019 and had previously received the Fred Williams Graduate Award for teaching in 2018. This year, he was again nominated for the Somers teaching Award in IAH. Academically and intellectually, Aaron is an outstanding student with numerous fellowships and awards. He received a short-term dissertation fellowship from the D'Arcy McNickle Center at Chicago's Newberry Library and the Everett Helm Visiting Fellowship from the Lily Library at Indiana University. His article on Indigenous communities in the Great Lakes will be published in the forthcoming collection, The Northern Midwest and the US-Canada Borderlands: Essays on a Lost Region, in 2020.
 
Steve Anderson: Steve has been a teaching assistant for one of our department's largest courses--Introduction to Comparative Politics--for several semesters. Given the number of students and the nature of the assignments, this is not an easy job, and Steve always performs beyond expectations. He provides quick, careful, and helpful feedback to students on their work, and he is careful and reliable. Our students are lucky to have him as a teacher, and I'm lucky to have him as an assistant!
 
Kesicia Dickinson: Kesicia is so smart, kind, and respectful. She is inclusive and strong and serves as a mentor to our newest students of color. She is constantly empowering other students who feel out of place in the academy and creating space for them to shine. When some students -- especially her more junior peers of color – feel isolated and feel imposter syndrome, she goes out of her way to remind them that they have earned their space in the discipline and reminds them that they have so much to contribute. Our department is trying so hard to build a minority politics initiative, and without Kesicia and her persistence, encouragement, and participation, we would be a much worse group and department. She kills people with kindness, is genuine, constructive, and empowering. I am so proud to have her as a student in the discipline. I have yet to meet someone as inclusive and encouraging as Kesicia.
 
Natasha Fowler: I’d like to give a huge shout out to Natasha for being an amazing mentor this year! She’s been helping me with my UURAF poster, and I have learned so much from her. From the background science to the research process as a whole, Natasha has played a crucial part in my learning. The process of researching, making, and presenting this poster to the lab has been an amazing experience overall and I couldn’t have done it without Natasha. Thank you so much for your help, patience, and enthusiasm Natasha!
 
Megan Mikhail: Megan, I'm so happy you are in our lab! I so enjoy when you present and teach in our lab meetings, you make the science so easy to understand and also so engaging. You are clearly passionate about your work and it is so awesome to see. I always appreciate your insights as well, you offer such constructive and thoughtful input into research discussions. You're a joy to work with!
 
Nafiseh Haghtalab: Nafiseh is appointed as the instructor of the online version of GEO204: World Regional Geography for Spring Semester 2020. These are unparalleled times for our world, students and the University alike and Nafiseh has done all that she can to help students continue to be successful in the course amidst a new, and often more complicated, set of circumstances. I sincerely appreciate Nafiseh for her dedication to teaching the online course and supporting her students; having Nafiseh as an instructor has made my job as the course’s administrator and coordinator that much easier and more enjoyable. Thank you Nafiseh for all that you do for onGEO and your students!
Anyone can recognize a fellow Spartan for their contributions to MSU's teaching and learning mission or for how they made a lasting impression on your experience. All you have to do is click "Thank an Educator" in the left panel of iteach.msu.edu. From there you'll be directed to a form where you can enter the name, netID, and a short story of the educator you'd like to recognize.

One key takeaway of our workshop is the degree to which being aware of and thinking critically about the way that general education courses fit into a larger curriculum can set you apart as both a teacher and a job candidate.For the sake of comparison, then, we have gathered together an incomplete (by design) map of various schools in Michigan to faciliate a comparison between the ways each defines their liberal arts or general education curriculum. (Image description: Map of the lower peninsula of Michigan, with brown pins marking Kalamazoo, Alma, Albion, Hillsdale, East Lansing, Ann Arbor, and Detroit)Each of the schools marked above requires some version of a general education/liberal arts* curriculum, and you may find that it's easier to articulate your own experience of this type of teaching when you compare it to some sister institutions. To that end, use the links below to explore how these various schools in Michigan define general education, and the way they structure their curriculum as a result.* Alma College refers to this curriculum as "distributive requirements." At Kalamazoo College, it's the K-Plan.(Schools arranged alphabetically)

Albion College
Alma College
Hillsdale College
Kalamazoo College
Michigan State University
University of Michigan
Wayne State University
Western Michigan University

You may find it helpful to use the following to guide your thinking:

Albion and Alma are both small liberal arts colleges with religious affiliations. How do you see those shared characters influencing their approach to general education requirements?
In many ways, Hillsdale College is very similar to Albion and Alma, but it regularly appears on lists of the most conservative colleges in America. Do you see that political orientation influencing the school's approach to liberal arts anywhere?
Kalamazoo College and Western Michigan University are both located in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Does that shared setting promote any meaningful comparisons or contrasts between their curricula?
MSU and U of M are the two highest-rated public universities in the state (though college rankings are an inherently fraught subject). How would you differentiate between the way both programs describe their general education/humanities curricula?
Wayne State University includes a number of additional links and philosophy statements about their general education program, which makes its website fairly comparable to the Center for Integrative Studies in the Arts and Humanities at MSU. What similarities/differences do you notice about the way Wayne State and Michigan State talk about the mission and goals of general education?

Please feel free to share your response to these questions, or any of your own reflections, as comments on this article in the space provided below.

D2L, MSU's learning management system, includes access to Ally, which is an accessibility tool that benefits both students and instructors. It provides alternative file types for students and suggestions on how to improve accessibility to instructors.The infographic below provides an overview of how instructors can benefit from Ally. This Canva link is to an accessible format of the infographic and includes links to useful resources. 

Since 2017, the MSU Strategic Communication Online M.A. has been helping working professionals advance their careers with skills the marketplace demands. A tenet of the program has been the fostering of interpersonal engagement, by creating spaces for student-to-student interaction and student-to-staff interaction. Through surveys and interviews with current students, we measure the importance of program engagement for students by tracking the effectiveness of: various communication mediums and tools; and personal touchpoints with classmates and MSU StratCom staff.

To access a PDF of the "The importance of interpersonal engagement in an online master's degree program" poster, click here.
Description of the Poster 
The importance of interpersonal engagement in an online master’s degree program 
 Introduction 
The purpose of this report is to provide the Michigan State University Strategic Communication Online M.A. a summary of students’ perceptions of engagement in the program. This report focuses on the responses of currently enrolled students as of Spring semester 2021. Students voluntarily responded to a survey sent out via email and social media. Additionally, students were given the option to agree to a second phone interview for further insights. The report looks at engagement through students’ connection to each other, to staff and faculty, and facilitated through various tools and media. 
Methodology 
Survey Purpose and Methodology 
To gain an understanding and perspective of students’ views on engagement in the StratCom program a written survey was sent by Daune Rensing, StratCom Student Advisor, via email.  


The email was sent to the MSU email address of students currently enrolled in either the StratCom master’s or certificate program, on March 15, 2021. 


Written reminders were sent March 22 and March 29. 


A video reminder was posted by Jason Archer, StratCom Director, on StratCom’s Student Life, Teams and Facebook pages on March 29. 




The 24-question survey was closed on April 2, extended from the original deadline of March 25. 


Sixty-two responses were received with 2 incomplete surveys, resulting in 60 responses.  


Phone Interview Purpose and Methodology 
To expand the understanding and perspective students views on engagement in the StratCom program, a follow up phone interview was conducted. Forty students responded positively to a question on the survey asking if they would be willing to participate in a follow-up phone interview with a fellow student. 
Limitations 
The limited nature of the data set needs to be taken into consideration when weighing the meaning and significance of the insights reported here. The written surveys were completed by students enrolled anywhere from their first semester to last in the program, which may affect their perceptions of the program. All phone interviews were conducted by one person, which may result in some bias of interpretation. 
Research Questions 
To measure the importance of engagement in the StratCom program, the research questions in the survey and phone interview fell into three categories:  

What tools and resources are important for student engagement in the StratCom program?  
Do students feel the StratCom program is meeting their engagement needs?  
What changes/improvements does the StratCom program need to make to meet students’ expectations? 

Results 
These graphs highlight responses to our first two questions of what students do value and what they don’t value, and that we are meeting their engagement needs. The conclusion, in more detail, addresses ways in which respondents feel StratCom can improve engagement. 
Conclusion 
Overwhelmingly, respondents felt that StratCom was meeting their engagement needs, in terms of tools used and connection to faculty and staff, and that it was an important part of their time in the program. To continue StratCom’s good start, some respondents had suggestions to strengthen their engagement experience even more:

Set expectations for tools and resources 
More student onboarding  
Intentional diversity throughout the program 
Develop stronger bonds with fellow students and instructors 
Standardization in the curriculum 
Use the coursework to develop student-led engagement activities in the program 

Future Work 
Planning for StratCom’s future and creating a sustainable engagement model are themes respondents suggested. For instance, leadership contingency plans, consistency among courses and “keeping their finger on the pulse” of student needs and industry requirements were all important things to consider moving forward. 
  
 

ChatGPT FAQ for MSU Educators
This Q&A is for educators who are interested in learning more about using ChatGPT in higher education. Use this list to learn the basics on how this technology can enhance teaching and learning experiences while also addressing concerns related to its potential misuse.
There are other chatbot platforms that existed before ChatGPT, such as Jasper.ai for marketing and creative content. There are also competing platforms that quickly entered the market following ChatGPT, such as Google Bard and Bing Chat. Many of the answers below also apply to these other AI platforms.
We are focusing on ChatGPT because of how often educators around the world are discussing its potential for disrupting current teaching and learning practices.

What is ChatGPT?
What can ChatGPT do and not do?
Can I trust ChatGPT?
How can I access ChatGPT to try it out?
What is ChatGPT Plus?
Are there tools that detect ChatGPT writing?
Does Turnitin detect AI generated text?
Are there other MSU supported tools that use AI?
What other tools can I use to compare AI detection results?
Is there a university policy on the use of AI tools like ChatGPT?
Is there a recommendation for how to address the use of AI tools in my class?
How can I improve the output from ChatGPT?
Could AI chatbots potentially create issues of digital equity for students?
What are the privacy concerns associated with using AI in education?
What is MSU doing and how can I stay connected with future developments?

Q1: What is ChatGPT?
A: ChatGPT is an AI chatbot that was launched by OpenAI in November 2022. GPT stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer. It is based on a Large Language Model (LLM) that checks for the probability of what words are likely to come next in a sequence. It is not the same as a search engine because it generates responses on the fly from a vast data source. The model is trained to sound like natural language and is optimized for dialogue. 
Q2: What can ChatGPT do and not do?
A: What ChatGPT can do:
ChatGPT can generate text related to natural language processing, including, but not limited to, answering questions, translating text from one language to another, providing writing assistance by proofreading, editing, and offering suggestions, generating content (e.g., writing an essay, creating a story or poem, summarizing a long article, brainstorming ideas), and engaging in conversations. The tool can also be used to generate and edit code.
In the context of higher education instruction, some educators have already started experimenting with ChatGPT for developing curriculum plans, learning activities, various types of assessments, and rubrics, as well as providing feedback on students’ writing. Students might use ChatGPT to explore different learning topics, get editing suggestions on their written work, brainstorm ideas for projects, and even generate responses to quizzes, exams, and essays, some of which would raise academic integrity issues.
What ChatGPT cannot do:
ChatGPT does not access current websites for information, and according to its statement of limitations, ChatGPT has “limited knowledge of world events after 2021,” and “may occasionally generate incorrect information” and “harmful instructions or biased content.” It is not very accurate at listing citations/references and all output should be checked, as it often makes things up. However, processes are improved with GPT-4 and results may change significantly with new versions over time.
While ChatGPT can create new content based on the data it has been trained on, it still lacks the ability to generate truly original ideas or solve complex problems that require higher-order thinking and creativity. Even though ChatGPT can assist with providing feedback on student work, it is important to note that OpenAI recommends against educators relying on ChatGPT, as giving student feedback involves possible decision making and complex, context-based considerations. See Educator Considerations for ChatGPT for more details of OpenAI’s discussion on the use of ChatGPT in education. 
ChatGPT can be used as an assistant for designing, developing, and teaching courses, but it is not a substitute for educators’ teaching expertise. The best way to learn about its capabilities and limitations is to experiment with ChatGPT within your specific teaching context.
Q3: Can I trust ChatGPT?
A: Ensuring that AI-driven data is accurate and unbiased is very important. The model’s output can sound convincing, but it doesn’t “know” what it is saying and will at times make things up. It is not a substitute for human expertise, judgement, and responsibility. Educators and students need to critically evaluate the information generated by ChatGPT. In practice, assume there are inaccuracies and possible biases (see OpenAI’s FAQ and the given limitations statement).
Ensuring that the collected data is secure and used ethically is also a major challenge. Avoid entering sensitive information. Do not provide any student information or student grades to ChatGPT, as it may be a FERPA violation for disclosing educational records to a third party without the student’s written consent.
Q4: How can I access ChatGPT to try it out?
A: The free version, GPT-3.5, is available at chat.openai.com. Sign up with an email address or Google account. You can create multiple sign-ins to use for work or personal use by using a different email. The sign-up process will ask for a phone number and send you a code for verification. You can use the same phone number for the verification process.
After signing up, go to chat.openai.com/chat. There is a text input field at the bottom where you will enter your prompt. Select “Regenerate response” for another version and scroll through the numbers to the left of the prompt to view each version. Continue refining your results by giving subsequent prompts or start a new chat from the menu on the left. You can edit chat labels or delete them by selecting the item in the menu. If you find an answer is incorrect, you can provide feedback by using the "Thumbs Down" button.
Q5: What is ChatGPT Plus (ChatGPT-4)?
A: ChatGPT Plus (ChatGPT-4) is available with a $20/month subscription. The upgrade provides better access during high demand, faster responses, and priority access to new features. One of the new plugins recently adds web browsing for more current data. GPT-4 surpasses ChatGPT in its advanced reasoning capabilities and can solve difficult problems with greater accuracy. You can access it from the menu options after signing up for the free version.
Q6: Are there tools that detect ChatGPT writing?
A: There are tools that claim to be able to detect AI generated text (e.g., Turnitin, CheckGPT, GPTZero). However, keep in mind that the only evidence is the presence of statistical markers about the likelihood of word patterns. It is possible for human writing to fall along similar patterns, leading to false positives, and it is also possible to produce AI-generated responses that go undetected, leading to false negatives. As of Aug. 1, no reliable detector has been identified, and the detectors that are widely available have been shown by multiple studies to be biased against English language learners and people with disabilities (e.g., GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers by Liang et al. and A study of implicit bias in pretrained language models against people with disabilities by Venkit et al.). Do not assume AI detectors are giving you absolute facts (see Can AI Generated Text be Reliably Detected by Sadasivan et al.), rather let them guide you in addressing concerns with students. 
The best approach is to have a conversation with the student about whether, how, and why they used the tool. For example, an international student may have entered their own work to polish up language structure. Some students may not know using the technology constitutes academic dishonesty, or to what extent they are allowed to get AI assistance if it hasn’t been mentioned explicitly.Be careful how you approach students and consider refraining from mentioning the use of AI detectors as a threat. “The use of these tools to evaluate student text can increase students’ anxiety and stress (both of which have been found to inhibit learning), while also creating an atmosphere of distrust.” [source: Evaluating Student Text with AI Text Detectors]
Bottom line, dedicate some classroom time to educating students about AI and what you consider to be misuse in your class. Have open discussions about its benefits and limitations. Help students understand the downsides of relying on it and emphasize the importance of developing their own writing abilities.
Q7: Does Turnitin detect AI generated text?
A: Turnitin has its own AI writing detection tool, however, it was removed from within the tool on our D2L instance due to concerns over bias and unreliability. Turnitin acknowledges that false positives and false negatives are possible. Again, as of Aug. 1, no reliable detector has been identified, and the detectors that are widely available have been shown by multiple studies to be biased against English language learners and people with disabilities (e.g., GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers by Liang et al. and A study of implicit bias in pretrained language models against people with disabilities by Venkit et al.).
Turnitin Disclaimer:
“Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify both human and AI-generated text) so it should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an organization's application of its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred.”
See the following for more Turnitin resources.

Turnitin’s AI Writing Detection FAQ
Academic integrity in the age of AI
AI conversations: Handling false positives for educators

Return to the Turnitin AI writing resource center for educators periodically to find current articles on this rapidly evolving topic.
Q8: Are there other MSU supported tools that detect AI?
A: Packback is an MSU supported AI tool that monitors student work. When using the Packback discussion tool, students are notified when AI generated text is detected, and guidance is provided on how to use AI tools with integrity. See the article, "Post may have been generated by AI" Reason for Moderation.
Packback also has a free AI detection tool called CheckGPT that can be used even if you don’t use the discussion feature, Packback Questions. CheckGPT will analyze a piece of text and suggest using what you learn to help create teaching moments with your students about ethical use and the importance of academic honesty. The tool author intentionally tuned CheckGPT towards a low false positive.Be aware that as of Aug. 1, no reliable detector has been identified, and the detectors that are widely available have been shown by multiple studies to be biased against English language learners and people with disabilities (e.g., GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers by Liang et al. and A study of implicit bias in pretrained language models against people with disabilities by Venkit et al.).
Q9: What other tools can I use to compare AI detection results?
A: Some other tools being used include GPTZero, Hive Moderation, and AI Text Classifier. Try submitting your own original work, as well as AI generated results, to get a better understanding of the differences between tools.
GPTZero is a free AI detection tool for educators that is finetuned for student writing and academic prose. You can analyze pasted text or upload files. There is also a separate product with a similar name called ZeroGPT.
Hive Moderation has an AI detection tool that will score the likelihood of generated text by segment. On top of an overall score, results include which engine created an image and which segment of text has the most probable artificial content.
If you search the internet, you will likely find many others (e.g., Top 7 Best Plagiarism Checkers For AI-Generated Content). Experiment with the different tools to get a feel for their usefulness within the context of your teaching. Use the tools as a point of discussion, rather than considering them as proof of misconduct, which may not be the case. Due to the unreliability, it is unclear whether detection has an advantage in the long-term as all have disclaimers.
Q10: Is there a university policy on the use of AI tools like ChatGPT?
A: On August 1, 2023, the Office of the Provost at MSU posted the Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidance, and Technology at MSU also shared an Interim Guidance on Data Uses and Risks of Generative AI. Check for related policies within your college or department. Consider explaining the new university guidance, existing academic integrity policies, and your approach to the use of AI tools in your course syllabus. 
MSU policies and resources related to academic integrity:

Spartan Code of Honor
Integrity of Scholarship and Grades
Student Rights and Responsibilities Article 7
MSU Campus Resources for Academic Integrity

Q11: Is there a recommendation for how to address the use of AI tools in my class?
A: Generally speaking, educators have been responding to the rise of AI tools by either resisting or adapting (see ChatGPT and AI Text Generators: Should Academia Adapt or Resist). Resistors may see more issues than benefits in using AI for teaching and assessing students. They prohibit, bypass or discourage the use of AI tools by returning to in-person pen and paper assessments or using AI detection tools to detect AI generated content. Educators who take a more adaptive approach will likely see more benefits of using AI in teaching and learning and the need of better preparing students for the challenges they will face in a post-AI world. Of course, how you address the use of AI tools in your course depends on your specific teaching context and course goals. An instructor teaching writing classes and an instructor teaching AI-related courses are likely to take different approaches.
In your course syllabus, make your expectations clear on whether students can use AI tools,  what students can use them for, what students should not use them for, and whether they need to explain how they have used them. The more detailed your expectations are, the less likely students will misuse these tools.
Carefully (re)design your course activities and assessments, whether you are embracing AI tools or discouraging the use of them in your course. Consider designing activities or assessments that encourage higher-order thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking (e.g., reflection activities or essays, activities that develop critical digital literacy, work that focuses on process over end-product, and real world, ill-structured problem-solving), which are essential for successful learning and resistant to students’ misuse of AI tools. Below are several resources for designing activities and assessments in the age of AI:

Five ways to prepare writing assignments in the age of AI by Turnitin
New modes of learning enabled by AI chatbots: Three methods and assignments by Ethan and Lilach Mollick, University of Pennsylvania - Wharton School

Q12: How can I improve the output from ChatGPT?
A: You can improve the output with targeted prompts and subsequent tasks, such as defining the structure type (essay, email, letter, blog, lesson, assignment, quiz, rubric, list, table, outline, etc.) and tone (professional, heartfelt, humorous, in the voice of a celebrity, for a fifth grader, etc.). You can give the chatbot a role and a task (prompt: “you are a college professor teaching __, write a ___ about ___). You can continue improving the output by providing more context details.
You can also train the model by providing a dataset of your own. It will not read text from a website by providing a url (try it sometime to see the model make stuff up). You will have to paste in the text with your request. For example, prompt ChatGPT to give you a summary of … “paste in article text” or ask for a list of discussion questions to give to students from the copied article text. If you want something more concise, give a subsequent prompt to “make it shorter”. If the text appears to have cutoff at the end, you can extend the length by telling ChatGPT to continue from “paste in the last sentence.” For more, see Open AI’s guide on prompt design.
Q13: Could AI chatbots potentially create issues of digital equity for students?
A: Using AI technology in the classroom may lead to unequal access for students. Those with slower internet speeds or no internet access at home may face disadvantages. Additionally, those who pay for subscriptions may have better access and results. Students at schools that prohibit the technology may also be at a disadvantage. However, AI technology can help alleviate inequity in some cases, such as assisting international students with grammar and improving communication with instructors. It can also provide academic support for students without access to private tutors.
Disclosure: The above paragraph was rewritten with the help of ChatGPT. The original is listed below.
The prompt given was simply “Rewrite: If you allow and even encourage the proper use of AI technology in your classroom, students will not all have the same level of access. Students who experience slower internet speeds or have no access to the internet at home may face a disadvantage. Additionally, during peak usage times, the free version may not be readily available. Those who pay for a subscription will have an advantage with better access and improved results. Students from schools that prohibit the use of the technology may find themselves disadvantaged relative to those who were trained to use it as a tool. The technology may help to alleviate inequity in other cases, such as helping an international student polish their grammar or improve communication with an instructor. Students without access to private tutors can potentially get assistance with their studies.”
Both versions are provided to give you an example of using ChatGPT to improve or shorten a piece of writing.
Q14: What are the privacy concerns associated with using AI in education?
A: The company collects information from you and/or your students when signing up for an account. Entering personally identifiable information related to your students in a prompt would be a FERPA violation because prompts may be reviewed by AI trainers to improve their systems. See the privacy-policy for more details. Instructors who are embracing the technology as a learning tool may be creating assignments that specifically encourage its use. However, students who are concerned about privacy issues may be reluctant to use the technology. Consider creating an alternative assignment for those cases.
Q15: What is MSU doing and how can I stay connected with future developments?
A: MSU offered a university-wide AI Symposium in February 2023, followed by on-going conversations within departments and academic programs around the topic. For example, there was an AI/IAH Workshop on April 14, 2023 (resources are posted on iTeach). Other AI coffee talks were posted on the MSU Library calendar. The MSU Spring Conference in May had sessions on the topic, as well as the EdTech Summit in June, 2023 MSU Educational Technology. Check with your department and the following areas to keep up on the latest developments.
iTeach & CTLI (Center for Teaching and Learning Innovation)

Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (and Learning)
AI & Education Group – login to find the group and join the growing list of members.
MSU’s Spring Conference on Teaching and Learning - May 2023
Using AI in Teaching & Learning iTeach playlist

EDLI (Enhanced Digital Learning Initiative) and Broad College

Short Overview of ChatGPT for University Faculty By Jeremy Van Hof, Eli Broad College of Business, MSU
Quarterly Newsletter Apr 2023

OSSA (Office of Student Support & Accountability) and MSU Policy

When It Comes to Academic Integrity, Even ChatGPT Has the Answer By Jake Kasper, Office of Student Support & Accountability
Office of Student Support & Accountability

Spartan Code of Honor
Integrity of Scholarship and Grades
Student Rights and Responsibilities Article 4
MSU Campus Resources for Academic Integrity



Spartan Newsroom and MSU Today

Are teachers ready for the rise of Artificial Intelligence? - January 20, 2023
What if AI helped write a commencement speech? ComArtSci 2023 commencement

Additional Resources:

Educator Considerations for ChatGPT By OpenAI
ChatGPT Updates and FAQ By OpenAI
ChatGPT General FAQ By OpenAI
AI Chatbot FAQ By Western Carolina University
ChatGPT & Education By Torrey Trust, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Academic integrity in the age of AI By Turnitin
White Paper: How Academia is Adapting to Generative AI
How to Productively Address AI-Generated Text in Your Classroom By Indiana University Bloomington

Currently, there is an explosion of tools integrating Chat AI tools. For example, Quizlet has a new tool called Q-Chat, Khan Academy recently developed Khanmigo, and Grammarly introduced a ChatGPT-style AI tool. On a humorous note, there is CatGPT (not a typo). More guidance and updates are likely to follow this getting started FAQ.Originally posted: May 2023Updated: Nov 2023

Image from U Central Florida
 
Challenge: Students lack discipline-specific vocabulary.
Strategy: Have a grad student collect and translate a glossary of common words in the field.
 
Challenge: Students are unsure how to respond to common writing prompts, like “synthesize” or “analyze.”
Strategies: Foreground these in a class session. Provide illustrations and examples.
Be consistent in your use of prompts.
Avoid embedded metaphor, like “leave breadcrumbs during your research.”
 
Challenge: Students hesitate to speak up in class.
Strategies: Allow a few minutes to make notes or freewrite answers before speaking.
Have students discuss in pairs and small groups before speaking before the entire class.
Be aware that their hesitation may be for linguistic or cultural reasons (they may not be used to active-learning classrooms).
 
Challenge: Students are not following the lecture or presentation.
Strategies: Don’t ask, “Does everyone understand?”
Ask students to demonstrate understanding by “saying back” (paraphrasing), giving examples, connecting a concept to a previous one…
Communicate concepts in different ways: visual illustrations, examples, stories…  Put keywords on slides or blackboards. Allow students to photograph board. Share slides with them.
 
Challenge: Students still haven’t mastered subject-verb agreement, verb tense consistency or definite and indefinite articles.
Strategy: Choose your battles. Some of these grammatical structures may be radically different in a student’s home language, and almost impossible to learn perfectly as an adult.
Consider, for example: Do you speak a Romance language? Do you ever make mistakes of noun gender? You probably do, but you can still communicate. Emphasize communication and clarity in your assessments.
 
Contact: Dr. Cheryl Caesar, WRAC, caesarc@msu.edu
Dr. Joyce Meier, WRAC, meierjo@msu.edu
Dr. Patricia Walters, ELC, walter31@msu.edu

Groups are segmented areas where the MSU Community can share information based on topics or membership. Groups allow for the creation of group-specific posts, playlists, and articles. 
Group Admins can make groups public, which will make them visible to non-members, who can request access to join the group. Groups can also be made private, which makes the group and the content only visible to group members. 
How do I create a group in the #iteachmsu Commons?
To create a group one, go to the add button in the upper right-hand corner and select "Group".
 
You can provide a group image if you wish, a group name, about information, connect the group to a particular category, and select the privacy settings.

Click here to watch a brief tutorial on creating groups: