We found 203 results that contain "innovation"
Posted on: #iteachmsu
Virtual Research Geriatric Fellowship for Unmatched Medical Graduates
With COVID19 pandemic most, if not all, research activities placed on hold in 2020. The need for remote teaching and working was obvious. The increase number of older adults in the US and world wide place geriatric medicine as a priority in addressing health need in the near future. According to Association of American Medical Colleges [AAMC] there is increasing number of medical graduates who do not match to any residency program in the US. We started a virtual research fellowship in geriatric medicine as a tool to empower some of those unmatched medical graduates in Michigan state and other areas using funds provided by The Pearl J. Aldrich Endowment in Gerontology/Michigan State University. One of the goals of this fellowship is to train these graduates to know the basic steps of any research work and how to use the tools available in any research environment. We hope that these students understand the methodology of identifying a problem that faces older adults, and then carry the required steps to address and solve such problem in a systematic way. Currently we have four teams, who are involved in different research projects. We have submitted 10 abstracts to 2 different meetings, and so far 6 were accepted for oral presentation. We targeted The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) and AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Some of the topics address include COVID19 and its impact on the elderly. During this session our team will share our experience.
To access a PDF of the "Virtual Research Geriatric Fellowship for Unmatched Medical Graduates" poster, click here.Description of the PosterTitle: Virtual Geriatric Research Fellowship
Author: Nadir Abdelrahman, MD, CMD
Geriatric Division, Dept of Family Medicine, MSU
Introduction:
Between 2020 and 2030, the number of older adults is projected to increase by almost 18 million 1.
The Association of American Medical Colleges expects that an additional 42,600 to 121,300 doctors will be needed by 2030 2.
There is a huge need for geriatric-trained health care providers 3.
Each year, there are more than 8 thousand Unmatched medical graduates [UMGs] in the US. Most of them are international medical graduates.
Aim:
The aim of this fellowship is to empower UMGs by improving their knowledge, skills, and experiences in geriatric medicine.
Curriculum Development:
This curriculum was developed based on Entering Research course.
The primary goals of this fellowship are to create a supportive learning environment to introduce UMGs to the culture of research and to teach them valuable skills needed to become effective researchers.
The fellowship was designed to help medical graduates find a research mentor, explore the culture of research, write a research project proposal, and begin doing research.
They informally share their research experiences and learn about the diversity of experiences available through their peers.
Through virtual meetings, research basics, communication skills and common geriatric principles were reviewed.
Early discussions included current pandemic topics ranging from COVID19 incidence, hospitalization and mortality to prevention and vaccination.
The content of these discussions came from the students, and their engagement in the weekly, 2-hour-long meetings.
The course facilitator provided a framework for the discussions, relevant background reading materials, and structured assignments designed to help students develop positive relationships with their research mentors, define themselves as a member of the research community, and understand and communicate their research.
Description of Curriculum
The following tasks were identified for this program
Recognize the research ethics principles.
Select a research topic.
Identify research question(s).
Describe various types of study designs.
Select appropriate study design.
Define study population.
Take an appropriate study sample.
Enumerate various study variables.
Discern various types of errors, including bias.
Identify confounding factors.
Select and use appropriate measurement tools.
Prepare for data management.
Set a work plan with time, budget, and a plan for dissemination.
Results of Implementation
A total of 6 Virtual posters were accepted in 2 national conferences: American Medical Director Association/The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care (PALTC21: 2 virtual posters) and American Geriatrics Society (AGS21: 4 virtual posters).
Eight of the fellows were matched into residency programs starting July 2021.
Discussion
This virtual research fellowship in geriatric medicine is considered unique and innovative as there is an immediate need for geriatric-trained health care providers.
The conceptual framework allows training program directors to identify and select appropriate activities to use with their trainees based on need and career stage.
Activities were designed to teach UMGs principles of research, research design, and critical evaluation of results while also giving them practice with the real-world experience of creating and presenting posters in virtual environment.
This fellowship achieved its goals using online tools.
In the coming year, we hope to expand this concept, and establish it as a model for implementation at other institutions.
Figure 1.
The four-box model
Disclosure
The author has no conflict of interest to disclose.
This fellowship is supported by:
The Pearl J. Aldrich Endowment in Aging
Demographic Changes and Aging Population – RHIhub Aging https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/aging/1/demographics
Healthcare Suers When Medical School Graduates Don’t Match https://www.insightintodiversity.com/healthcare-suffers-when-medical-school-graduates-dont-match/
Record number of unmatched medical graduates. CMAJ 2017 May 29;189:E758-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1095432
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1969). Management of organizational behaviour: Utilizing human resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Tasks and Team approach
Fellows were grouped into teams.
Different tasks were assigned to each fellow.
Teams leaders encouraged individual fellows
Projects identified and project leaders assured completion of each Poster.
Fellows learned the basics of literature review, statistical analysis (using SPSS) and reference management (e.g EndNote)
Situational leadership skills and teams were incorporated using the four-box model 4 (See Figure 1)
References
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=nursingposters
https://slideplayer.com/slide/6319238/
https://www.mghihp.edu/poster-presentations-age-zoom
To access a PDF of the "Virtual Research Geriatric Fellowship for Unmatched Medical Graduates" poster, click here.Description of the PosterTitle: Virtual Geriatric Research Fellowship
Author: Nadir Abdelrahman, MD, CMD
Geriatric Division, Dept of Family Medicine, MSU
Introduction:
Between 2020 and 2030, the number of older adults is projected to increase by almost 18 million 1.
The Association of American Medical Colleges expects that an additional 42,600 to 121,300 doctors will be needed by 2030 2.
There is a huge need for geriatric-trained health care providers 3.
Each year, there are more than 8 thousand Unmatched medical graduates [UMGs] in the US. Most of them are international medical graduates.
Aim:
The aim of this fellowship is to empower UMGs by improving their knowledge, skills, and experiences in geriatric medicine.
Curriculum Development:
This curriculum was developed based on Entering Research course.
The primary goals of this fellowship are to create a supportive learning environment to introduce UMGs to the culture of research and to teach them valuable skills needed to become effective researchers.
The fellowship was designed to help medical graduates find a research mentor, explore the culture of research, write a research project proposal, and begin doing research.
They informally share their research experiences and learn about the diversity of experiences available through their peers.
Through virtual meetings, research basics, communication skills and common geriatric principles were reviewed.
Early discussions included current pandemic topics ranging from COVID19 incidence, hospitalization and mortality to prevention and vaccination.
The content of these discussions came from the students, and their engagement in the weekly, 2-hour-long meetings.
The course facilitator provided a framework for the discussions, relevant background reading materials, and structured assignments designed to help students develop positive relationships with their research mentors, define themselves as a member of the research community, and understand and communicate their research.
Description of Curriculum
The following tasks were identified for this program
Recognize the research ethics principles.
Select a research topic.
Identify research question(s).
Describe various types of study designs.
Select appropriate study design.
Define study population.
Take an appropriate study sample.
Enumerate various study variables.
Discern various types of errors, including bias.
Identify confounding factors.
Select and use appropriate measurement tools.
Prepare for data management.
Set a work plan with time, budget, and a plan for dissemination.
Results of Implementation
A total of 6 Virtual posters were accepted in 2 national conferences: American Medical Director Association/The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care (PALTC21: 2 virtual posters) and American Geriatrics Society (AGS21: 4 virtual posters).
Eight of the fellows were matched into residency programs starting July 2021.
Discussion
This virtual research fellowship in geriatric medicine is considered unique and innovative as there is an immediate need for geriatric-trained health care providers.
The conceptual framework allows training program directors to identify and select appropriate activities to use with their trainees based on need and career stage.
Activities were designed to teach UMGs principles of research, research design, and critical evaluation of results while also giving them practice with the real-world experience of creating and presenting posters in virtual environment.
This fellowship achieved its goals using online tools.
In the coming year, we hope to expand this concept, and establish it as a model for implementation at other institutions.
Figure 1.
The four-box model
Disclosure
The author has no conflict of interest to disclose.
This fellowship is supported by:
The Pearl J. Aldrich Endowment in Aging
Demographic Changes and Aging Population – RHIhub Aging https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/aging/1/demographics
Healthcare Suers When Medical School Graduates Don’t Match https://www.insightintodiversity.com/healthcare-suffers-when-medical-school-graduates-dont-match/
Record number of unmatched medical graduates. CMAJ 2017 May 29;189:E758-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1095432
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1969). Management of organizational behaviour: Utilizing human resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Tasks and Team approach
Fellows were grouped into teams.
Different tasks were assigned to each fellow.
Teams leaders encouraged individual fellows
Projects identified and project leaders assured completion of each Poster.
Fellows learned the basics of literature review, statistical analysis (using SPSS) and reference management (e.g EndNote)
Situational leadership skills and teams were incorporated using the four-box model 4 (See Figure 1)
References
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=nursingposters
https://slideplayer.com/slide/6319238/
https://www.mghihp.edu/poster-presentations-age-zoom
Authored by:
Nadir Abdelrahman, Sumi Dey
Posted on: #iteachmsu
ASSESSING LEARNING
Automated analyses of written responses reveal student thinking in STEM
Formative assessments can provide crucial data to help instructors evaluate pedagogical effectiveness and address students' learning needs. The shift to online instruction and learning in the past year emphasized the need for innovative ways to administer assessments that support student learning and success. Faculty often use multiple-choice (MC) assessments due to ease of use, time and other resource constraints. While grading these assessments can be quick, the closed-ended nature of the questions often does not align with real scientific practices and can limit the instructor's ability to evaluate the heterogeneity of student thinking. Students often have mixed understanding that include scientific and non-scientific ideas. Open-ended or Constructed Response (CR) assessment questions, which allow students to construct scientific explanations in their own words, have the potential to reveal student thinking in a way MC questions do not. The results of such assessments can help instructors make decisions about effective pedagogical content and approaches. We present a case study of how results from administration of a CR question via a free-to-use constructed response classifier (CRC) assessment tool led to changes in classroom instruction. The question was used in an introductory biology course and focuses on genetic information flow. Results from the CRC assessment tool revealed unexpected information about student thinking, including naïve ideas. For example, a significant fraction of students initially demonstrated mixed understanding of the process of DNA replication. We will highlight how these results influenced change in pedagogy and content, and as a result improved student understanding.To access a PDF of the "Automated analyses of written responses reveal student thinking in STEM" poster, click here.Description of the Poster
Automated analyses of written responses reveal student thinking in STEM
Jenifer N. Saldanha, Juli D. Uhl, Mark Urban-Lurain, Kevin Haudek
Automated Analysis of Constructed Response (AACR) research group
CREATE for STEM Institute, Michigan State University
Email: jenifers@msu.edu
Website: beyondmultiplechoice.org
QR code (for website):
Key highlights:
Constructed Response (CR) questions allow students to explain scientific concepts in their own words and reveal student thinking better than multiple choice questions.
The Constructed Response Classifier (CRC) Tool (free to use: beyondmultiplechoice.org) can be used to assess student learning gains
In an introductory biology classroom:
Analyses by the CRC tool revealed gaps in student understanding and non-normative ideas.
The instructor incorporated short term pedagogical changes and recorded some positive outcomes on a summative assessment.
Additional pedagogical changes incorporated the next semester led to even more positive outcomes related to student learning (this semester included the pivot to online instruction).
The results from this case study highlight the effectiveness of using data from the CRC tool to address student thinking and develop targeted instructional efforts to guide students towards a better understanding of complex biological concepts.
Constructed Response Questions as Formative Assessments
Formative assessments allow instructors to explore nuances of student thinking and evaluate student performance.
Student understanding often includes scientific and non-scientific ideas [1,2].
Constructed Response (CR) questions allow students to explain scientific concepts in their own words and reveal student thinking better than multiple choice questions [3,4].
Constructed Response Classifier (CRC) tool
A formative assessment tool that automatically predicts ratings of student explanations.
This Constructed Response Classifier (CRC) tool generates a report that includes:
categorization of student ideas from writing related to conceptual understanding.
web diagrams depicting the frequency and co-occurrence rates of the most used ideas and relevant terms.
CRC Questions in the Introductory Biology Classroom :
A Case study
Students were taught about DNA replication and the central dogma of Biology.
Question was administered as online homework, completion credit provided. Responses collected were analyzed by the CRC tool.
CRC question:
The following DNA sequence occurs near the middle of the coding region of a gene. DNA 5' A A T G A A T G G* G A G C C T G A A G G A 3'
There is a G to A base change at the position marked with an asterisk. Consequently, a codon normally encoding an amino acid becomes a stop codon. How will this alteration influence DNA replication?
Part 1 of the CRC question used to detect student confusion between the central dogma processes.
Related to the Vision & Change core concept 3 “Information Flow, Exchange, and Storage" [5], adapted from the Genetics Concept Assessment [6,7].
Insight on Instructional Efficacy from CRC Tool
Table 1: Report score summary revealed that only a small fraction of students provided correct responses post instruction. (N = 48 students).
Student responses
Spring 2019
Incorrect
45%
Incomplete/Irrelevant
32%
Correct
23%
Sample incorrect responses:
Though both incorrect, the first response below demonstrates understanding of a type of mutation and the second one uses the context of gene expression.
“This is a nonsense mutation and will end the DNA replication process prematurely leaving a shorter DNA strand” (spellchecked)
“It will stop the DNA replication… This mutation will cause a gene to not be expressed”
CRC report provided:
Response score summaries
Web diagrams of important terms
Term usage and association maps
The instructor Identified scientific and non-scientific ideas in student thinking
This led to:
Short term pedagogical changes, same semester
During end of semester material review, incorporated:
Small group discussions about the central dogma.
Discussions about differences between DNA replication, and transcription and translation.
Worksheets with questions on transcribing and translating sequences.
Figure one:
The figure depicts an improvement in student performance observed in the final summative assessment.
Percentage of students who scored more than 95% on a related question:
In the unit exam = 71%
Final summative exam = 79%
Pedagogical Changes Incorporated in the Subsequent Semester
CR questions:
Explain the central dogma.
List similarities and differences between the processes involved.
Facilitated small group discussions for students to explain their responses.
Worksheets and homework:
Transcribe and translate DNA sequences, including ones with deletions/additions.
Students encouraged to create their own sequences for practice.
Revisited DNA replication via clicker questions and discussions, while students were learning about transcription and translation.
Table 2: 68% of students in the new cohort provided correct responses to the CRC question post instruction. (N = 47 students).
Student Responses
Spring 2020
Incorrect
19%
Incomplete/Irrelevant
13%
Correct
68%
Conclusions
The results from this case study highlight the effectiveness of using data from the CRC tool to address student thinking and develop targeted instructional efforts to guide students towards a better understanding of complex biological concepts.
Future Directions
Use the analytic rubric feature in the CRC tool to obtain further insight into normative and non-normative student thinking.
Use the clicker-based case study available at CourseSource about the processes in the central dogma [8].
Incorporate additional CRC tool questions in each course unit.
Questions currently available in a variety of disciplines:
Biology, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Physiology, and Statistics
Visit our website beyondmultiplechoice.org and sign up for a free account
References:
Ha, M., Nehm, R. H., Urban-Lurain, M., & Merrill, J. E. (2011). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 379-393.
Sripathi, K. N., Moscarella, R. A., et al., (2019). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), ar37.
Hubbard, J. K., Potts, M. A., & Couch, B. A. (2017). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar26.
Birenbaum, M., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1987). Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(4), 385-395.
"Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action." American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC (2011).
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2008). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 422-430.
Prevost, L. B., Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2016). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar65.
Pelletreau, K. N., Andrews, T., Armstrong, N., et al., (2016). CourseSource.
Acknowledgments.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (DUE grant 1323162). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting agencies.
Automated analyses of written responses reveal student thinking in STEM
Jenifer N. Saldanha, Juli D. Uhl, Mark Urban-Lurain, Kevin Haudek
Automated Analysis of Constructed Response (AACR) research group
CREATE for STEM Institute, Michigan State University
Email: jenifers@msu.edu
Website: beyondmultiplechoice.org
QR code (for website):
Key highlights:
Constructed Response (CR) questions allow students to explain scientific concepts in their own words and reveal student thinking better than multiple choice questions.
The Constructed Response Classifier (CRC) Tool (free to use: beyondmultiplechoice.org) can be used to assess student learning gains
In an introductory biology classroom:
Analyses by the CRC tool revealed gaps in student understanding and non-normative ideas.
The instructor incorporated short term pedagogical changes and recorded some positive outcomes on a summative assessment.
Additional pedagogical changes incorporated the next semester led to even more positive outcomes related to student learning (this semester included the pivot to online instruction).
The results from this case study highlight the effectiveness of using data from the CRC tool to address student thinking and develop targeted instructional efforts to guide students towards a better understanding of complex biological concepts.
Constructed Response Questions as Formative Assessments
Formative assessments allow instructors to explore nuances of student thinking and evaluate student performance.
Student understanding often includes scientific and non-scientific ideas [1,2].
Constructed Response (CR) questions allow students to explain scientific concepts in their own words and reveal student thinking better than multiple choice questions [3,4].
Constructed Response Classifier (CRC) tool
A formative assessment tool that automatically predicts ratings of student explanations.
This Constructed Response Classifier (CRC) tool generates a report that includes:
categorization of student ideas from writing related to conceptual understanding.
web diagrams depicting the frequency and co-occurrence rates of the most used ideas and relevant terms.
CRC Questions in the Introductory Biology Classroom :
A Case study
Students were taught about DNA replication and the central dogma of Biology.
Question was administered as online homework, completion credit provided. Responses collected were analyzed by the CRC tool.
CRC question:
The following DNA sequence occurs near the middle of the coding region of a gene. DNA 5' A A T G A A T G G* G A G C C T G A A G G A 3'
There is a G to A base change at the position marked with an asterisk. Consequently, a codon normally encoding an amino acid becomes a stop codon. How will this alteration influence DNA replication?
Part 1 of the CRC question used to detect student confusion between the central dogma processes.
Related to the Vision & Change core concept 3 “Information Flow, Exchange, and Storage" [5], adapted from the Genetics Concept Assessment [6,7].
Insight on Instructional Efficacy from CRC Tool
Table 1: Report score summary revealed that only a small fraction of students provided correct responses post instruction. (N = 48 students).
Student responses
Spring 2019
Incorrect
45%
Incomplete/Irrelevant
32%
Correct
23%
Sample incorrect responses:
Though both incorrect, the first response below demonstrates understanding of a type of mutation and the second one uses the context of gene expression.
“This is a nonsense mutation and will end the DNA replication process prematurely leaving a shorter DNA strand” (spellchecked)
“It will stop the DNA replication… This mutation will cause a gene to not be expressed”
CRC report provided:
Response score summaries
Web diagrams of important terms
Term usage and association maps
The instructor Identified scientific and non-scientific ideas in student thinking
This led to:
Short term pedagogical changes, same semester
During end of semester material review, incorporated:
Small group discussions about the central dogma.
Discussions about differences between DNA replication, and transcription and translation.
Worksheets with questions on transcribing and translating sequences.
Figure one:
The figure depicts an improvement in student performance observed in the final summative assessment.
Percentage of students who scored more than 95% on a related question:
In the unit exam = 71%
Final summative exam = 79%
Pedagogical Changes Incorporated in the Subsequent Semester
CR questions:
Explain the central dogma.
List similarities and differences between the processes involved.
Facilitated small group discussions for students to explain their responses.
Worksheets and homework:
Transcribe and translate DNA sequences, including ones with deletions/additions.
Students encouraged to create their own sequences for practice.
Revisited DNA replication via clicker questions and discussions, while students were learning about transcription and translation.
Table 2: 68% of students in the new cohort provided correct responses to the CRC question post instruction. (N = 47 students).
Student Responses
Spring 2020
Incorrect
19%
Incomplete/Irrelevant
13%
Correct
68%
Conclusions
The results from this case study highlight the effectiveness of using data from the CRC tool to address student thinking and develop targeted instructional efforts to guide students towards a better understanding of complex biological concepts.
Future Directions
Use the analytic rubric feature in the CRC tool to obtain further insight into normative and non-normative student thinking.
Use the clicker-based case study available at CourseSource about the processes in the central dogma [8].
Incorporate additional CRC tool questions in each course unit.
Questions currently available in a variety of disciplines:
Biology, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Physiology, and Statistics
Visit our website beyondmultiplechoice.org and sign up for a free account
References:
Ha, M., Nehm, R. H., Urban-Lurain, M., & Merrill, J. E. (2011). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 379-393.
Sripathi, K. N., Moscarella, R. A., et al., (2019). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), ar37.
Hubbard, J. K., Potts, M. A., & Couch, B. A. (2017). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar26.
Birenbaum, M., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1987). Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(4), 385-395.
"Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action." American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC (2011).
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2008). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 422-430.
Prevost, L. B., Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2016). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar65.
Pelletreau, K. N., Andrews, T., Armstrong, N., et al., (2016). CourseSource.
Acknowledgments.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (DUE grant 1323162). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting agencies.
Authored by:
Jenifer Saldanha, Juli Uhl, Mark Urban-Lurain, Kevin Haudek
Posted on: #iteachmsu
Automated analyses of written responses reveal student thinking in STEM
Formative assessments can provide crucial data to help instructors ...
Authored by:
ASSESSING LEARNING
Monday, Apr 26, 2021
Posted on: #iteachmsu
DISCIPLINARY CONTENT
"Thank an Educator": Recognizing and Celebrating MSU Educators
Dr. Crystal Eustice (Department of Community Sustainability Studies Assistant Professor of Practice, Academic Advisor, Internship Coordinator) & Jackie Martin (MSU Extension Leadership & Civic Engagement Educator, 4-H Program Supervisor)
The Thank an Educator Initiative was born out of the #iteachmsu Commons project, an effort to recognize the great practices of individuals on campus who contribute to student success by supporting MSU’s teaching and learning mission. On such a large decentralized campus, it can be difficult to fully recognize and leverage the expertise of educators. The #iteachmsu Commons' current focus has been to develop and launch a web platform for educators across campus to share their expertise and experience, connect with others, and grow in their practice.
You’ll notice that we’ve specifically chosen to denote the audience of this platform as “educators” which the #iteachmsu Commons’ founding units (the Hub for Innovation in Learning and Technology, the Academic Advancement Network, and the Graduate School) define in the broadest sense – anyone who contributes to MSU’s teaching and learning mission. This includes but is not limited to faculty, academic advisors, librarians, coaches, graduate teaching assistants, undergraduate learning assistants, infrastructure planning and facilities, learning designers, IT, planning and budget, staff, etc.
We (the #iteachmsu Commons team) have had unwavering enthusiasm for the platform, which is now live at iteach.msu.edu, but we weren’t sure that the Spartan community would identify with the goals of the project (despite the platform’s for educators – by educators development). As a part of my 2018-19 Hub Graduate Student Fellowship, I was able to further observe and investigate how individuals on our campus qualified their work (as it related to the mission and vision) and how they identified with the role of educator. While I found overwhelming support for the type of platform we were building, many of the individuals I spoke with did not personally identify as an educator despite their work contributing to teaching and learning at State. Thus Thank an Educator was born.
I designed and launched the inaugural year of Thank and Educator as a part of my Hub fellowship last year as a way to celebrate all the individuals who contribute every day to helping MSU be the institution of higher learning that it is today. By intentionally launching the initiative across the MSU community and asking for individuals to share stories of the positive impacts made by MSU educators, we were able to not only recognize the great efforts of invaluable Spartan community members but also showcase the diverse roles and ways in which people take up being educators on our campus. 80 Educators were nominated by fellow Spartans and were recognized at the first annual #iteachmsu Educator Awards during last year’s Spring Conference on Student Learning and Success. This initiative wouldn’t be possible without the support of Dr. Jeff Grabill (Associate Provost for Teaching, Learning, and Technology) and the Provost’s office, and I am excited to say that it is continuing in this 2019-20 academic year.
I have been at Michigan State for the entirety of my postsecondary experience. I came here in 2008 for my B.S., finished a M.S., and plan to complete my doctoral degree by the end of this academic year. Throughout my time as a Spartan, I have encountered countless individuals who were invaluable to my experience but weren’t limited to those who stood at the front of my classes. Thank an Educator gives me the opportunity to recognize those people who made a difference in my MSU experience (as both a learner and a colleague), and for that I am thrilled. I have received correspondence from individuals directly, saw posts featuring educator awards on Twitter, and have even seen award certificates hanging in offices or by desks. I am deeply honored by the idea that I have played a small part in amplifying the work educators do at MSU, and reinforcing the value of that work through this initiative and community.
Anyone can recognize a Spartan educator who has made an impact in their lives by clicking “Thank an Educator” in the left panel of this site! You can also read about educators who have been recognized in our "Featured Educator" posts!
Vivek Vellanki (College of Education Doctoral Student) & Terry Edwards (Assistant to the Chair, Department of Teacher Education)
https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2019/honoring-msus-educators/
The Thank an Educator Initiative was born out of the #iteachmsu Commons project, an effort to recognize the great practices of individuals on campus who contribute to student success by supporting MSU’s teaching and learning mission. On such a large decentralized campus, it can be difficult to fully recognize and leverage the expertise of educators. The #iteachmsu Commons' current focus has been to develop and launch a web platform for educators across campus to share their expertise and experience, connect with others, and grow in their practice.
You’ll notice that we’ve specifically chosen to denote the audience of this platform as “educators” which the #iteachmsu Commons’ founding units (the Hub for Innovation in Learning and Technology, the Academic Advancement Network, and the Graduate School) define in the broadest sense – anyone who contributes to MSU’s teaching and learning mission. This includes but is not limited to faculty, academic advisors, librarians, coaches, graduate teaching assistants, undergraduate learning assistants, infrastructure planning and facilities, learning designers, IT, planning and budget, staff, etc.
We (the #iteachmsu Commons team) have had unwavering enthusiasm for the platform, which is now live at iteach.msu.edu, but we weren’t sure that the Spartan community would identify with the goals of the project (despite the platform’s for educators – by educators development). As a part of my 2018-19 Hub Graduate Student Fellowship, I was able to further observe and investigate how individuals on our campus qualified their work (as it related to the mission and vision) and how they identified with the role of educator. While I found overwhelming support for the type of platform we were building, many of the individuals I spoke with did not personally identify as an educator despite their work contributing to teaching and learning at State. Thus Thank an Educator was born.
I designed and launched the inaugural year of Thank and Educator as a part of my Hub fellowship last year as a way to celebrate all the individuals who contribute every day to helping MSU be the institution of higher learning that it is today. By intentionally launching the initiative across the MSU community and asking for individuals to share stories of the positive impacts made by MSU educators, we were able to not only recognize the great efforts of invaluable Spartan community members but also showcase the diverse roles and ways in which people take up being educators on our campus. 80 Educators were nominated by fellow Spartans and were recognized at the first annual #iteachmsu Educator Awards during last year’s Spring Conference on Student Learning and Success. This initiative wouldn’t be possible without the support of Dr. Jeff Grabill (Associate Provost for Teaching, Learning, and Technology) and the Provost’s office, and I am excited to say that it is continuing in this 2019-20 academic year.
I have been at Michigan State for the entirety of my postsecondary experience. I came here in 2008 for my B.S., finished a M.S., and plan to complete my doctoral degree by the end of this academic year. Throughout my time as a Spartan, I have encountered countless individuals who were invaluable to my experience but weren’t limited to those who stood at the front of my classes. Thank an Educator gives me the opportunity to recognize those people who made a difference in my MSU experience (as both a learner and a colleague), and for that I am thrilled. I have received correspondence from individuals directly, saw posts featuring educator awards on Twitter, and have even seen award certificates hanging in offices or by desks. I am deeply honored by the idea that I have played a small part in amplifying the work educators do at MSU, and reinforcing the value of that work through this initiative and community.
Anyone can recognize a Spartan educator who has made an impact in their lives by clicking “Thank an Educator” in the left panel of this site! You can also read about educators who have been recognized in our "Featured Educator" posts!
Vivek Vellanki (College of Education Doctoral Student) & Terry Edwards (Assistant to the Chair, Department of Teacher Education)
https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2019/honoring-msus-educators/
Authored by:
Makena Neal
Posted on: #iteachmsu
"Thank an Educator": Recognizing and Celebrating MSU Educators
Dr. Crystal Eustice (Department of Community Sustainability Studies...
Authored by:
DISCIPLINARY CONTENT
Thursday, Oct 31, 2019