We found 95 results that contain "share"

Our conversation of Masland on 10/8 broke free from the agenda in the best ways, but here's a link to that doc nonetheless for posterity's sake.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dnU9rmQWICUUihIajmjXG8jg2t2OX4aMMoJGE5nXA9E/edit?usp=sharing

What pedagogy texts inform your practice? Can you share who you're reading and how it's affected what you do in the classroom, as a way to crowd-source different resources and practice that crucial "how I talk about how I teach" element we discussed?

Good morning, MSU! I'm Julie Taylor, Publishing Services Coordinator at the Libraries, and today I'm hosting an Ask Me Anything on Incorporating technologies at the MSU Libraries from book design to 3D printing to laser and vinyl cutting to poster plotting. Please share your questions and ideas by commenting on this post.

Attention new supervisors and MSU leaders - Human Resources has just launched a New Leader Development Series with three different tracks. Those interested can take individual tracks or all three. Applications opened on December 15th and will close January 5th, 2024 at 5PM. Please visit the following link or share with colleagues that may be interested. Space is limited and there is a fee associated: https://hr.msu.edu/professional-development/courses/leadership/new-leader-development-series.html

Here is a downloadable file of the Center for Teaching and Learning Innovation (CTLI) mid-semester feedback survey sample questions. You can also access the Google Doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bvWBucqNfRfc938QekLlealPf4XbIbBCg1Bz5UgwUjY/edit?usp=sharing

Please note that there are colleges and units across MSU's campus that are already offering support to their instructors in collecting formative feedback. This effort is to complement these services and make them accessible to the broader MSU instructor community. Feel free to use these questions verbatim, or tailor to best suit your course(s).

Good morning folks -

If you are attending today's fall faculty kickoff (and I hope you are!), here are some links that will be relevant to our conversation together.

Google Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1QG5flec5jpldyXJzy1gVU3oYYv_V4voD2bcGy624yZ0/edit?usp=sharing
Nearpod: https://app.nearpod.com/presentation?pin=BAPI2
Kickoff feedback: https://forms.gle/onkoGGinUy1MmWvt8
Fall workshop preferences: https://forms.gle/ceDsiacbPygYewmK9

Looking forward to seeing folks at 10 am in STEM 3201 or on Zoom (credentials below)!
- GJS

Join Zoom Meeting
https://msu.zoom.us/j/94737592393?pwd=VzlhZlBmNXErcDV6R1Byczk1eFRKQT09

Meeting ID: 947 3759 2393
Passcode: IAH!

Massive changes have occurred recently with regard to artificial intelligence (AI) and the ability of the public to generate novel text and images using AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT). Many in education are concerned with what this means for assessing student understanding: if a student can generate a novel, accurate essay on almost any topic, how will you assess learning from short-answer and essay assignments?

On 02/01/2023, a campus collaboration of the APUE STEM+ Ed@State, Enhanced Digital Learning Initiative (EDLI), Center for Teaching and Learning Innovation (CTLI), MSU Libraries, and MSU IT EdTech, hosted the "Symposium on AI in Education and Academic Writing". During the symposium, the basics of how AI works were shared and attendees had opportunities to play with some AI tools. The event provided opportunities to hear how faculty are addressing these challenges, discuss concerns and opportunities with colleagues, and reflect on individual teaching philosophies in the time of artificial intelligence (AI).

A couple of resources I want to share:
Preparing Instructional Objectives: A Critical Tool in the Development of Effective Instruction 3rd Edition
by Robert F. Mager (cheap used versions available)

I've only begun digging through this, and I am hoping it will help me to clarify and target the kind of thinking I would like to promote in my teaching:
The Rationality Quotient: Toward a Test of Rational Thinking. Stanovich, West and Toplak

'Smart people do foolish things because intelligence is not the same as the capacity for rational thinking. The Rationality Quotient explains that these two traits, often (and incorrectly) thought of as one, refer to different cognitive functions. The standard IQ test...doesn't measure any of the broad components of rationality—adaptive responding, good judgment, and good decision making. The authors show that rational thinking, like intelligence, is a measurable cognitive competence....[T]hey present the first prototype for an assessment of rational thinking analogous to the IQ test: the CART (Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking).